Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
Comparable box dimension
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
GitLab community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Zdenek Dvorak
Comparable box dimension
Commits
53a740d3
Commit
53a740d3
authored
3 years ago
by
Daniel Gonçalves
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Update comparable-box-dimension.tex
parent
29287779
Branches
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
1 merge request
!2
Update comparable-box-dimension.tex
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
comparable-box-dimension.tex
+4
-4
4 additions, 4 deletions
comparable-box-dimension.tex
with
4 additions
and
4 deletions
comparable-box-dimension.tex
+
4
−
4
View file @
53a740d3
...
...
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ behave well with respect to full clique-sums.
sum extendable representation
$
h
$
by comparable boxes in
$
\mathbb
{
R
}^{
\max
(
d
_
1
,d
_
2
)
}$
.
\end{lemma}
The proof is
in the appendix
, but the idea is to translate (allowing
The proof is
omitted
, but the idea is to translate (allowing
also exchanges of dimensions) and scale
$
h
_
2
$
to fit in
$
h
_
1
^
\varepsilon
(
C
_
1
)
$
.
The following lemma enables us to pick the root clique at the expense of increasing
...
...
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ the dimension by $\omega(G)$.
$
C
^
\star
$
-clique-sum extendable touching representation by comparable
boxes in
$
\mathbb
{
R
}^
d
$
, for
$
d
=
|V
(
C
^
\star
)
|
+
\ecbdim
(
G
\setminus
V
(
C
^
\star
))
$
.
\end{lemma}
The proof is also
in the appendix
, but it essentially the same as the one of
The proof is also
omitted
, but it
is
essentially the same as the one of
Lemma~
\ref
{
lemma-apex
}
.
The following lemma provides an upper bound on
$
\ecbdim
(
G
)
$
in terms
of
$
\cbdim
(
G
)
$
and
$
\chi
(
G
)
$
.
...
...
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ $h(v_i)[j] \cap h^\varepsilon(C)[j] = [p(C)[j],p(C)[j]+\varepsilon]$ for suffici
\end{proof}
The
\emph
{
treewidth
}
$
\tw
(
G
)
$
of a graph
$
G
$
is the minimum
$
k
$
such that
$
G
$
is a subgraph of a
$
k
$
-tree.
Note that actually the bound on the comparable box dimension of Theorem~
\ref
{
thm-ktree
}
extends to graphs of treewidth at most
$
k
$
(
see the proof in the appendix
).
extends to graphs of treewidth at most
$
k
$
(
proof omitted
).
\begin{corollary}
\label
{
cor-tw
}
Every graph
$
G
$
satisfies
$
\cbdim
(
G
)
\le\tw
(
G
)+
1
$
.
\end{corollary}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment