Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
assignments
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
datovky
assignments
Commits
b504241b
Commit
b504241b
authored
5 years ago
by
Martin Mareš
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Splay experiment: Better description of method overriding
parent
946d8418
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
03-splay_experiment/task.md
+4
-5
4 additions, 5 deletions
03-splay_experiment/task.md
with
4 additions
and
5 deletions
03-splay_experiment/task.md
+
4
−
5
View file @
b504241b
...
...
@@ -54,11 +54,10 @@ The output of the program contains one line per experiment, which consists of:
## Your implementation
Please use your implementation from the previous exercise. If you used C++,
you should declare the
`splay()`
and
`rotate()`
methods as virtual (they will
be overriden by the test program). Also, if you are performing a double rotation
directly instead of composing it from single rotations, you need to adjust
the
`BenchmarkingTree`
class accordingly.
Please use your implementation from the previous exercise. Methods
`splay()`
and
`rotate()`
will be augmented by the test program. If you are performing
a double rotation directly instead of composing it from single rotations, you
need to adjust the
`BenchmarkingTree`
class accordingly.
## Hints
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment